Writing & media

Technical format: Skill

Stories

Turn documented project evidence into a case study and one audience adaptation.

What Stories does

Turn documented project evidence into a case study and one audience adaptation.

For
Project maintainers and writers who need a documented account of work.
Bring
A permitted project-evidence packet, audience, intended use, evidence labels and sharing boundaries.
Action
Build a shared claims ledger, draft one project case study, adapt its emphasis for one audience, then review unsupported claims.
Output
A case study, one adaptation, shared claims ledger and review notes.

Runtime and prerequisites

The writing method runs in your existing AI agent. An optional read-only checker uses Python 3.11+ and the standard library; it does not judge factual truth or privacy.

  • A skill-capable assistant; Python3.11+ only for the optional read-only checker. No other capability is required.

Read the repository installation steps

How the work moves

Explicit selected evidence and audience choices feed a shared claim ledger. The caller drafts a case study and one audience adaptation, reviews their consistency and stops at local files. Missing evidence or cancellation returns a gap or stop response. No publishing engine is included.

Workflow from the capability documentation · MIT license

Example output

A fictional project case study, one audience adaptation and a shared claim ledger.

Fictional illustration, not a result from your task or measured user evidence.

Limitations

The checker validates structure and boundaries, not truth, prose quality or privacy. No session mining, renderer or publisher.

Explore by kind of work

Browse all capabilities

Related tools & research

Sources to compare or explore alongside this capability. A listing does not imply an integration, partnership or endorsement.

Skills & plugins 1 source
Skills & pluginsInspiration

Amplifier Stories

The credited MIT upstream contributes evidence, narrative and audience-adaptation ideas.

Difference: This extraction produces one documented project case study plus one adaptation and a shared claims ledger. It omits autonomous session mining, publishing and renderer machinery.

Reviewed

Research & guidance 2 sources
Research & guidanceComplement

Diátaxis

Its distinction between reader needs helps choose the purpose and audience of a project account.

Difference: A project case study is not automatically a tutorial, how-to guide, reference or explanation. No Diátaxis text, diagrams or code were copied.

Reviewed

Research & guidanceInspiration

W3C PROV overview

Provenance concepts offer a review lens for the link between a claim and the activity or source supporting it.

Difference: Stories has a simpler local claims ledger. It does not emit PROV, implement its ontology or claim standards conformance.

Reviewed

Commercial tools 1 source
Commercial toolsAlternative

Storydoc case study creator

A hosted option for interactive case studies, collaboration and audience personalization.

Difference: Stories produces a local text packet with explicit evidence boundaries; it has no hosted design, tracking, CRM or Storydoc integration.

Reviewed