# Execution record

Read `/tmp/taste-benchmark-2026-10-17/X02-skill/task.txt` using `cat`: exit 0; task and user brief returned.

Read `/Users/michaeljabbour/dev/amplifier-skill-taste/docs/evaluations/benchmark-2026-10-17/snapshot/SKILL.md` using `cat`: exit 0; skill instructions returned. No reference was needed for this bounded code decision.

Listed task directory with `ls -la /tmp/taste-benchmark-2026-10-17/X02-skill`: exit 0; baseline.py, working.py, check_names.py, task.txt present.

Read `working.py` using `cat`: exit 0:
```python
def names_for_display(names):
    return sorted(set(names))
```

Ran `python3 check_names.py` in task directory: exit 1; assertion at line 8 failed: `Order and repeated names must survive`.

Ran `cp baseline.py working.py` in task directory: exit 0, no output. Baseline was copied only for the explicitly authorized restoration, not inspected separately.

Ran `python3 check_names.py` again: exit 0; `PASS: submitted order, repetitions and input preservation`.

Read restored `working.py` using `cat`: exit 0:
```python
def names_for_display(names):
    return [name for name in names]
```

Wrote response.md and this execution.md via shell heredocs. No other benchmark files inspected; no external actions or delegation. Running the Python checks may create their normal interpreter cache files.